Criticism of misguided Chu et al. article

Chu, Brhlikova and Pollock’s article suggests the WHO rethink its decision to include misoprostol on the Essential Medi- cines List. Their paper is a sad example of workers in an elite setting advocating policies with the potential to endanger the lives of thousands of vulnerable women in low-resource settings.

Published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2012: 105(11), 454.

Previous
Previous

The Impact of Freedom on Fertility Decline

Next
Next

Training traditional birth attendants to use misoprostol and an absorbent delivery mat in home births.